In a case where the complaint, indictment, or information has been filed under seal, and notwithstanding Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(4), the attorney for the government may provide a copy of the sealed complaint, indictment, or information to the defendant’s attorney prior to the initial appearance under Fed. R. Crim. P. 5, without the Court’s unsealing of the complaint, indictment, or information.
Unless and until the Court unseals the complaint, indictment, or information, the defendant’s attorney must not disclose the contents of the sealed complaint, indictment, or information to any person other than the defendant and attorneys, experts, investigators, or consultants hired by or assisting the defense. The defendant must not disclose the contents of the complaint, indictment, or information to any person other than his or her attorney, spouse, registered domestic partner, or parent(s).
Amendment History to Crim. LR 5 | |
---|---|
March 1, 2016 | |
LR 3004 | New Rule. |
August 1, 2019 | |
Crim. LR 5 | Renumbered from LR 3004 to Crim. LR 5 to correspond with the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. |
As a part of the plea agreement, the parties may wish to stipulate to certain factors that affect the sentencing guidelines computation. Any such stipulations shall be set forth in a manner prescribed by the Sentencing Commission Policy Statement contained in Section 6B1.4 of the Guidelines Manual.
Amendment History to Crim. LR 11 | |
---|---|
August 1, 2019 | |
Crim. LR 11-1 | New rule. |
When a witness is outside this District or the directly adjacent counties to this District in Washington state, defense counsel representing a defendant who is unable to pay process costs or witness fees must apply for issuance of a subpoena as prescribed in Fed. R. Crim. P. 17(b).
A defendant who is self-represented and who is unable to pay process costs or witness fees must apply for the issuance of subpoenas as set forth by Fed. R. Crim. P. 17(b).
Except as authorized by the Court, appointed attorney, or defendant, the United States Marshal must not disclose the name and address of persons served pursuant to this rule; and returns of service on such witnesses are to be filed and maintained under seal until the witnesses have testified.
Amendment History | |
---|---|
December 1, 2020 |
|
Crim. LR 17 |
New Rule. |
September 3, 2024 |
|
Crim. LR 17-1(c) |
Replaced "Pro Se" with "Self-Represented" in the sub-heading and replaced "acting pro se" with "self-represented" in the body of the rule. |
(See Fed. R. Crim. P. 32)
If a sentencing date has not been set at the time of the commencement of the pre-plea presentence investigation, the probation office shall confer with the parties and the Court to propose an appropriate disclosure timeline based upon an anticipated sentencing date. The pre-plea presentence report shall otherwise be prepared and disclosed according to the requirements set forth in Fed. R. Crim. P. 32 and Local Rules.
Amendment History to Crim. LR 32 | |
---|---|
August 1, 2019 |
|
Crim. LR. 32-1 |
New rule promulgated to replace Standing Order 2013-2. |
Crim. LR. 32-2 |
Renumbered from LR 3003. Added subsection letters "(a)" and "(b)" for clarity and consistency. Added subsection (a)(4): "If a defendant is engaged in pre- or post-sentencing litigation related to a criminal charge filed in this district, and the defendant has a prior federal conviction in this district for which a presentence report was prepared, the probation office shall, upon request, disclose the final presentence report for the prior conviction to the attorneys for the government and the defendant unless otherwise directed by the Court. Any presentence report for a prior conviction that is disclosed to the government or the defense is subject to the same redisclosure limitations set forth above." After the second sentence in subsection (b), deleted: "A knowing violation of any of the above provisions may be treated as a contempt of Court." |
September 3, 2024 |
|
Crim. LR 32-2(a)(2) |
Replaced "appears pro se" with "is self-represented." |
With the consent of the defendant, and subject to the commentary which follows this local rule, video teleconference (VTC) proceedings are authorized in the following criminal proceedings:
A defendant wishing to appear by video conference shall notify the Clerk's Office and the United States Marshal, through counsel, at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing.
Any other party seeking to have the defendant appear by teleconference shall notify defense counsel to request consent at least fourteen (14) days prior to the hearing.
Time periods set forth in Crim. LR 43-2may be waived to accommodate exigent matters.
At the commencement of any VTC proceeding, the Court will confirm defendant's consent on the record.
Amendment History to Crim. LR 43 | |
---|---|
September 22, 2003 | |
LR 3000 |
This new rule is intended to provide guidance to litigants and court agencies about video teleconference (VTC) proceedings in criminal cases. This rule provides a limited exception to the general preference of the Court for the personal appearance of a defendant (unless that appearance has been waived). See Fed. R. Crim. P. 43 (defendant's presence required for specified proceedings). In establishing this rule, the Court recognizes that in some instances, the personal appearance of a defendant may be outweighed by such factors as transportation burdens for the U.S. Marshal or the defendant, the defendant's age or medical status, U.S. Marshal's security concerns, etc. In opposition to these concerns, factors weighing against VTC proceedings include: (1) Shifting travel costs from one party to another by requiring attorneys and interpreters to travel to the defendant's location instead of bringing the defendant to court; (2) Potential degradation of the attorney-client relationship, and the need for defendants to consult privately with their attorneys before and during the course of proceedings; (3) Pretrial Services' need to interview defendants and facilitate the expeditious release of eligible defendants; (4) The U.S. Marshal's need to have the defendant physically present for booking and processing; (5) Defense counsel's need to review and explain documents to the defendant; and (6) Potential VTC technology problems between sites. |
LR 3000.1 |
Consent Requirements: Appearance by a defendant at a VTC proceeding requires consent of the defendant. "Consent," as used in this rule, is understood to mean "after advice of counsel". Consent should not be obtained by means of pre-printed forms or Miranda-type waivers. A defendant who is represented by counsel may consent or object to a VTC proceeding through counsel. Absence of consent shall in no manner be used against the defendant. Consultation with Counsel: In all cases in which the right to counsel applies, a defendant must be afforded the opportunity to consult privately with counsel before giving consent to a VTC proceeding. Opportunity to confer privately with counsel must also be available during the appearance itself. In general, this means that counsel must have the opportunity to be physically present with the defendant. Interpreters: A defendant whose primary language is not English must be afforded an interpreter for proceedings which are on the record as well as for private communication with counsel. In many such instances, VTC proceedings are impractical unless arrangements can be made to place the defendant, defense counsel, and the interpreter in the same physical location. |
LR 3000.2 |
Notice Requirements: The 10-day notice requirement provides time for the U.S. Marshal's Service to confirm the defendant's location; confirm whether VTC capabilities exist at the facility where a defendant is incarcerated; and ultimately to determine whether to transport the defendant to court in lieu of the VTC proceeding. A list of VTC sites will be maintained by the Clerk's Office. The 14-day notice to the Court Clerk facilitates scheduling courtroom VTC equipment. Both notice requirements provide defense counsel sufficient time to review the application and confer with his client; and when appropriate, either object to the VTC proceeding, or make necessary travel or other logistical arrangements. Section (c) permits accommodation for exigent circumstances, i.e. emergency matters, expedited first appearances or unavailability of a judicial officer. |
August 1, 2019 | |
Crim. LR 43 | Renumbered from LR 3000 to Crim. LR 43 to correspond with the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. |
Crim. LR 43-1 | Renumbered from LR 3000.1 to Crim. LR 43-1. After "commentary," changed "which" to "that." |
Crim. LR 43-2 | Renumbered from LR 3000.2 to Crim. LR 43-2. Updated rule references in subsection (c) to Crim. LR 43-2(a) and 43-2(b). |
Crim. LR 43-3 | Renumbered from LR 3000.3 to Crim. LR 43-3. |
The District of Oregon uses the federal judiciary's electronic case management and electronic files system (CM/ECF) to support electronic filing and service in criminal cases and to provide electronic access to Court records. To the extent that they are not inconsistent with the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Local Rules of Civil Procedure referred to in this rule provide guidance for filing practices in criminal cases.
Unless otherwise limited by these rules, Registered Users must file all pleadings, documents (including attachments and exhibits), and other papers electronically through CM/ECF. All pleadings and documents, including attachments and exhibits, must be filed as text-searchable PDF files, unless otherwise directed by the Court.
Registered Users must follow the electronic filing requirements as described in detail in the CM/ECF User Manual on the Court's website at ord.uscourts.gov. This manual may be updated periodically to conform to new releases or features of CM/ECF. Notice of any updates will be posted on the Court's website.
Attorneys admitted to the bar of this Court pursuant to LR 83-1, LR 83-3, and LR 83-4 must register and maintain active accounts with PACER (pacer.uscourts.gov), and register to e-file in CM/ECF. Upon registration, attorneys are deemed to be Registered Users for purposes of these Local Rules.
A self-represented party who is not incarcerated may apply to the assigned judge for permission to become a Registered User in his or her specific case. Upon application, a self-represented party consents to electronic service via CM/ECF. If approved as a Registered User, that individual will become a Registered User in the specific case only, subject to all of the requirements of Crim. LR 49 49 and any other applicable rules.
The following documents cannot be filed electronically and must instead be filed in paper:
Demonstrative or oversized exhibits need not be filed electronically.
Electronic trial exhibits are to be submitted to the Clerk's Office per the requirements and procedures as described in "Submission Requirements for Electronic Trial Exhibits" found on the Court's website. Physical exhibits are to be handled in accordance with the trial judge's instructions.
In accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 49(e), the electronic filing of a document (together with CM/ECF transmission of the Notice of Electronic Filing) constitutes filing of that document, the official record for all purposes of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and the Local Rules of this Court, and entry of the document on the docket kept by the clerk.
The clerk will scan and convert a paper filing in its entirety to an electronic replacement for docketing in CM/ECF. Subsequently, the paper filing will be disposed of in accordance with guidance from the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.
Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, a paper copy, properly fastened pursuant to LR 10-1(f), of motions in limine, motions to dismiss, suppression motions, motions for injunctive relief (including all related documents), and any documents in excess of ten pages, and accompanied by the Notice of Electronic Filing, must be marked as a "JUDGE'S COPY" and delivered to the Clerk's Office within three business days after the electronic filing.
The filing party is responsible for perfecting paper service in any manner permitted by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (and for filing a Certificate of Service with the Clerk's Office) for every:
Electronically filed documents may contain hyperlinks to other portions of the same document and/or hyperlinks to a location on the Internet that contains a source document for a citation.
Hyperlinks to cited authority do not replace standard citation format. Complete citations must be included within the text of the document. Neither a hyperlink, nor any site to which it refers, is considered part of the record. Hyperlinks are simply convenient mechanisms for accessing material cited in an electronically filed document.
The Court neither endorses nor accepts responsibility for any product, organization, or content at any hyperlinked site, or at any site to which that site may be linked.
Every order or other Court-issued document filed electronically without the original signature of a judge or clerk has the same force and effect as if the judge or clerk had signed a paper copy of the order and it had been entered on the docket in a conventional manner. Orders may also be issued as "text only" entries on the docket, without an attached document.
Practice Tip |
---|
In accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P 49(e), the Clerk's Office does not mail a paper copy of electronically filed judgments to Registered Users who have been electronically served. |
Electronically filed documents such as affidavits or declarations under penalty of perjury that contain original signatures of persons who are not Registered Users must be maintained in their original paper form by the Registered User until the later of:
On request of the Court or a party, the Registered User must provide the document for review.
Information posted on CM/ECF may not be downloaded for uses inconsistent with the privacy concerns of any person.
Amendment History to Crim. LR 49 | |
---|---|
March 1, 2014 | |
LR 3001-1 | Former rule title ("Application (See LR 100)") stricken. Former rule text that, "Unless otherwise directed by the Court, the provisions of LR 100 apply to all criminal cases pending within the District of Oregon, or after March 1, 2004" stricken. |
LR 3001-1 | New rule titled "CM/ECF – Case Management and Electronic Case File System" based on former civil LR 100-1. |
LR 3001-2 | New rule titled "Mandatory Electronic Filing; Format of Filing" and Practice Tips based on former civil LR 100-2. |
LR 3001-3 | New rule titled "CM/ECF User Manual" and Practice Tips based on former civil LR 100-3. |
LR 3001-4 | New rule titled "CM/ECF Users (See also LR 83)" based on former civil LR 100-4. |
LR 3001-5 | New rule titled "Official Case Record" based on former civil LR 100-5. |
LR 3001-6 | New rule titled "Clerk's Conversion of a Paper Filing into an Electronic Replacement" based on former civil LR 100-6. |
LR 3001-7 | New rule titled "Judge's Paper Copy Requirements (See LR 5-9 and LR 10-1(e), (g) and Practice Tips)" based on former civil LR 100-7. |
LR 3001-8 | New rule titled "Service (See also LR 2001-1 and 3001-2)" based on former civil LR 100-8. |
LR 3001-9 | New rule titled "Hyperlinks" based on former civil LR 100-9. |
LR 3001-10 | New rule titled "Court Orders and Judgments" based on former civil LR 100-10. |
LR 3001-11 | New rule titled "Retention Requirements (See LR 100-3)" based on former civil LR 100-11. |
LR 3001-12 | New rule titled "Personal Privacy Issues (See also LR 3-7)" based on former civil LR 100-12. |
August 1, 2019 |
|
Crim. LR 49 |
Renumbered from LR 3001 to Crim. LR 49 to correspond with Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Renamed rule from "Rule Governing CM/ECF: Case Management and Electronic Filing – Practices" to "Rules Governing Electronic Filing, Service and Records." |
Crim. LR 49-1 |
Renumbered from LR 3001-1 to Crim. LR 49-1. Deleted "CM/ECF" from rule title and added "s" to "File." Added "electronic case management and electronic files system" after "judiciary's" and added parentheses around "CM/ECF." |
Crim. LR 49-2 |
Renumbered from LR 3001-2 to Crim. LR 49-2. Deleted "the" preceding and "system" following "CM/ECF." |
Crim. LR 49-3 |
Renumbered from LR 3001-3 to Crim. LR 49-3. Deleted "on the For Attorneys page under the E-Filing tab" following ord.uscourts.gov. Deleted "the" preceding and "system" following "CM/ECF." |
Crim. LR 49-4 |
Renumbered from LR 3001-4 to Crim. LR 49-4. Crim. LR 49-4(a): added "CM/ECF" before "User" and deleted "in the CM/ECF system" after "Account." Crim LR. 49-4(b): deleted "the CM/ECF" before "electronic." Crim LR 49-4(c): updated reference to Crim. LR 49 from LR 3001. Deleted "the" preceding and "system" following "CM/ECF." |
Crim. LR 49-5 |
Renumbered from LR 3001-5 to Crim. LR 49-5. Crim. LR 49-5(d): deleted "the" preceding and "system's" following "CM/ECF." |
Crim. LR 49-6 |
Renumbered from LR 3001-6 to Crim. LR 49-6. Deleted "the" preceding and "system" following "CM/ECF." |
Crim. LR 49-7 |
Renumbered from LR 3001-7 to Crim. LR 49-7. Updated references to local rules of civil procedure. |
Crim. LR 49-8 |
Renumbered from LR 3001-8 to Crim. LR 49-8. Updated "see also" references to renumbered Crim. LR 49-1 and 49-2. |
Crim. LR 49-9 |
Renumbered from LR 3001-9 to Crim. LR 49-9. |
Crim. LR 49-10 |
Renumbered from LR 3001-10 to Crim. LR 49-10. |
Crim. LR 49-11 |
Renumbered from LR 3001-11 to Crim. LR 49-11. |
Crim. LR 49-12 |
Renumbered from LR 3001-12 to Crim. LR 49-12. Inserted "in" and deleted "on the" preceding and "system" following "CM/ECF." |
January 21, 2020 |
|
Crim. LR 49-2 Practice Tips |
Deleted. |
Crim. LR 49-3 |
Replaced "are to" with "must." |
Crim. LR 49-3 Practice Tips |
Deleted. |
Crim. LR 49-4 |
Updated reference to local rules of civil procedure. |
Crim. LR 49-4(a) |
Replaced "Attorneys" with "Users" in rule heading. Amended to "Attorneys admitted to the bar of this Court pursuant to LR 83-1, 83-3, and LR 83-4 must register and maintain active accounts with PACER (pacer.uscourts.gov), and register to e-file in CM/ECF. Upon registration, attorneys are deemed to be Registered Users for purposes of these Local Rules." |
Crim. LR 49-4(b) |
Deleted. |
Crim. LR 49-4(c) |
Renumbered to Crim. LR 49-4(b). Amended to "A self-represented party who is not incarcerated may apply to the assigned judge for permission to become a Registered User in his or her specific case. Upon application, a self-represented party consents to electronic service via CM/ECF. If approved as a Registered User, that individual will become a Registered User in the specific case only, subject to all of the requirements of Crim. LR 49 and any other applicable rules." |
Crim. LR 49-6 |
Replaced "may" with "will" after (1) "clerk" and (2) "filing." Replaced "posting to" with "docketing in." Replaced "If the clerk does so" with "Subsequently." Deleted "returned to the filing party or" before "disposed." |
Crim. LR 49-7 |
Updated references to local civil rules. Added "accompanied by" before "the Notice." |
December 1, 2020 |
|
Crim. LR 49-5(a)(2) |
Deleted. Renumbered from LR 49-5(a)(3). |
Crim. LR 49-5(a)(3) |
Renumbered from LR 49-5(a)(4). |
Crim. LR 49-12 |
Deleted reference to LR 3-7 after rule heading. |
September 3, 2024 |
|
Crim. LR 49-4(b) |
Replaced "self-represented" with "Self-Represented" in the rule subheading and replaced "self-represented" with "self-represented" in the body of the rule. |
(See Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1)
The responsibility to redact filings pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1 rests with counsel and the party or non-party making the filing. The Clerk’s Office is not required to review documents filed with the court for compliance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1.
Amendment History to Crim. LR 49.1 | |
---|---|
March 1, 2012 | |
LR 3002 | New Rule, based on Advisory Committee Notes for the 2007 adoption for Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2 and Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1 |
August 1, 2019 |
|
Crim. LR 49.1 |
Renumbered from LR 3002 to Crim. LR 49.1 to correspond with the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. |
(See Fed. R. Crim. P. 58)
Practice Tip |
---|
The current Court-approved CVB collateral forfeiture schedule is available on the Court's website (ord.uscourts.gov). |
Amendment History to Crim LR. 58 | |
---|---|
August 1, 2019 |
|
Crim. LR 58 |
New rule. |